36º Torneio de computadores dedicados - 2 de junho de 2018

participantes:

#	computador	rating	operador
1	Excalibur Mirage (robô)	1837	Paul Wiselius
2	Fidelity Phantom (robô)	1877	Hein Veldhuis
3	Novag Constellation Forte B	1885	Hans van Mierlo
4	Mephisto Monte Carlo	1881	Franz Bittner
5	Fidelity AVG Mobile master	1837	Tobias Gora
6	Fidelidade Excellence EP12 4 MHz	1840	Ries van Leeuwen
7	Excalibur Grandmaster		Peter Schimmelpennink
8	Saitek Kasparov Blitz	1779	Rob van Son
9	SciSys Turbo King	1883	? Bittner
10	Granadeiro Tigre	1882	Ruud Martin

Mikhail Botvinnik vs Jose Raul Capablanca

Scorpio jogou imediato Ba3!

Elite V9

Super 9 encontrou o movimento correto, Ba3! Outras versões do Elite, como V.9 e V.10 e V11 não foram capazes de encontrar.

 

Mephisto Polgar x Novag Super Expert 5 MHz

Testes apenas com computadores com rating semelhantes.

[Event "30 minutos"] [Site "Sao Paulo"] [Date "2018.03.10"] [White "Mephisto Polgar"] [Black "Novag Super Expert 5 MHz"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "D25"] [WhiteElo "1975"] [BlackElo "1977"] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.10 (14s)"] [PlyCount "178"] [EventCountry "BRA"] 1. d4 d5 2. c4 dxc4 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. e3 Bg4 5. Bxc4 e6 6. h3 Bh5 7. O-O Nbd7 8. Nc3 Bd6 9. e4 e5 10. Be2 O-O 11. dxe5 Nxe5 12. Nd4 Bxe2 13. Qxe2 Ng6 {[#] LiveBook: 10 Games} 14. Be3 $146 {D25: Queen's Gambit Accepted: 4 e3: sidelines and 4...Bg4} ({Predecessor:} 14. Nf5 Be5 15. Bg5 Qc8 16. Rac1 Re8 17. Qf3 Re6 18. Rfd1 c6 19. Nd5 Bxb2 20. Rc2 Be5 21. Bxf6 Bxf6 { 1-0 (39) Makarov,M (2515)-Drozdovskij,Y (2421) St Petersburg 2000}) 14... Qe8 15. f3 Rd8 16. Ndb5 {[%eval 0,19]} (16. Nf5 $16 {[%eval 76,18]}) 16... Be5 17. Qc4 ({Stronger than} 17. Bxa7 Nf4 $17) 17... c6 18. Nxa7 {[%eval -49,17]} (18. Nd4 $1 $11 {[%eval 0,20] feels stronger.}) 18... Qe7 {[%eval 3,16]} (18... Ra8 $15 {[%eval -49,17]} 19. Bc5 Qb8 20. Bxf8 Nxf8) 19. Bc5 {[%eval -127,21]} (19. Rfd1 $11 {[%eval 3,16] keeps the balance.}) 19... Bd6 $36 {[%mdl 3072] Black has strong compensation. Black is in control.} 20. Bb6 $2 {[%eval -299,18]} ( 20. Bxd6 $17 {[%eval -88,18] was called for.} Qxd6 21. Rad1) 20... Bc7 $2 { [%eval -73,17]} (20... Qe5 $19 {[%eval -299,18] has better winning chances.} 21. Ne2 Qh2+ 22. Kf2 Ne5) 21. Bf2 $2 {[%eval -361,18][%mdl 8192]} (21. Be3 $17 {[%eval -73,17]}) 21... Qe5 $1 $19 {[%csl Gc7][%cal Re5h2]} 22. g3 Qh5 23. Kg2 Qxf3+ {[%eval -220,23]} (23... Rd2 $142 {[%eval -388,18]} 24. e5 Qxe5) 24. Kxf3 Ne5+ {[%cal Bg6e5,Be5c4,Bc4d2][%mdl 32]} 25. Kg2 Nxc4 26. b3 Nd2 27. Rfe1 Be5 28. Rac1 Bxc3 29. Rxc3 Ndxe4 30. Rc4 Nxf2 31. Kxf2 Rd2+ 32. Re2 Rxe2+ 33. Kxe2 {[%mdl 4096] Endgame KRN-KRN} Re8+ 34. Kd3 Nd5 35. Kd2 Re3 36. Rg4 f5 {[#]} 37. Rg5 $2 {[%eval -476,21]} (37. Rb4 $1 {[%eval -225,21][%mdl 512] might work better.} Re7 (37... Nxb4 38. Kxe3) 38. Rd4) 37... f4 {[%eval -283,22]} (37... g6 $142 {[%eval -476,21]} 38. g4 f4) 38. gxf4 {Rxd5! is the strong threat.} Rxh3 39. f5 Rh2+ 40. Kd3 Rxa2 41. Nc8 Ra3 42. Kc2 h6 43. Rg3 Ra2+ 44. Kd3 b6 45. Nd6 c5 46. Ne8 {[%eval -249,23]} (46. Kc4 {[%eval -184,22] was necessary.} Rd2 47. Nc8) 46... Nf4+ 47. Ke3 Nh5 48. Rg6 Ra8 49. Nc7 Rc8 50. Nd5 Re8+ 51. Re6 Rxe6+ 52. fxe6 {KN-KN} g5 53. Ke4 b5 54. Ke5 {[%eval -304,25] [#]} (54. Ne3 $17 {[%eval -156,24]}) 54... c4 {[%eval -159,25]} (54... g4 $1 $19 {[%eval -304,25] White must now prevent ...g3.} 55. Ke4 Kf8) 55. bxc4 $17 bxc4 56. Kd4 {[%eval -339,25] [#]} (56. Kd6 {[%eval -200,24] was the only defense.}) 56... Ng7 $1 $19 57. Nf6+ Kf8 58. Kxc4 Nxe6 59. Kd5 Nf4+ 60. Ke4 {intending Kf5.} Kf7 61. Kf5 Ne6 62. Nh5 $2 {[%eval -32685,21]} (62. Nd7 $19 {[%eval -331,26]} Ng7+ 63. Kg4) 62... Ng7+ 63. Kg4 Nxh5 64. Kxh5 {KP-KP} Kf6 65. Kg4 h5+ 66. Kg3 Kf5 67. Kf3 h4 68. Kg2 Kg4 69. Kh2 Kf3 70. Kh1 Kf2 71. Kh2 g4 72. Kh1 Kf1 73. Kh2 g3+ 74. Kh3 Kf2 75. Kxh4 {KP-K} g2 76. Kg4 Kf1 77. Kf4 g1=Q 78. Ke4 {Black mates.} Qc5 79. Kd3 Kf2 {[%cal Bf1f2,Bf2f3,Bf3e4,Be4d5,Bd5d6,Bd6c6][%mdl 32]} 80. Ke4 Qe3+ 81. Kd5 Kf3 82. Kd6 Ke4 83. Kc6 Qd4 84. Kc7 Kd5 85. Kb7 Qa4 86. Kb6 Kd6 87. Kb7 Qb4+ 88. Ka7 Kc6 {[%csl Gc6][%cal Rb4b7]} 89. Ka6 Qa4# { Accuracy: White = 26%, Black = 54%.} (89... Qa3# $142 {[%eval -32765,7]}) 0-1

36 segundos, Ba3, level 4. valorização 0,15

Saitek Blitz - mate em cinco - teórico

Mephisto Rebel x Novag Constellation Expert

Duas partidas, duas vitórias para o Rebel. Na primeira partida, Novag estava ganho mas cometeu erro fatal, propiciando Rebel arrematar. Interessante, porque Rebel segundo wiki, tem rating menor do que Novag Constellation Expert. 

Novag Constellation Expert, ano de lançamento 1985, rating 1901, programador Kittinger, David, processador C5C02, 8 bits.

[Event "30 segundos por mov"] [Date "2018.05.11"] [White "Mephisto Rebel"] [Black "Novag Constellation Expert"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "E01"] [WhiteElo "1872"] [BlackElo "1901"] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.10 (14s)"] [PlyCount "137"] 1. Nf3 d5 2. d4 Nf6 3. c4 e6 4. g3 Be7 5. Nbd2 (5. Bg2 O-O 6. O-O dxc4 7. Qc2 a6 8. a4 Bd7 9. Bg5 Bc6 10. Rd1 b5 11. Bxf6 Bxf6 12. Nc3 Qe8 13. d5 exd5 14. Nd4 Qe5 15. e4 dxe4 16. axb5 axb5 17. Nxc6 Nxc6 18. Rxa8 Rxa8 19. Qxe4 Qxe4 20. Bxe4 {1/2-1/2 (32) Wojtaszek,R (2744)-Giri,A (2777) Shamkir 2018}) 5... c5 6. cxd5 {E01: Catalan: Early deviations} cxd4 7. dxe6 Bxe6 8. Bg2 $146 { The position is equal.} ({Predecessor:} 8. Nb3 Bb4+ 9. Bd2 Bxd2+ 10. Qxd2 Bxb3 11. axb3 Nc6 12. Bg2 {0-1 (35) Dragomirescu,A (2270)-Doncea,V (2404) Mamaia 2012}) 8... O-O 9. Nb3 Bb4+ 10. Bd2 Bxd2+ 11. Nfxd2 Qb6 12. O-O Nc6 13. Rc1 Rac8 14. a3 $2 {[%eval -150,20]} (14. Nc4 $1 $14 {[%eval 44,20]} Qd8 15. Nc5) 14... Ne5 $17 15. Rxc8 Rxc8 16. h3 d3 {[%eval -106,21]} 17. Re1 {[%eval -158, 19]} Nfd7 {[%eval -100,21]} 18. Bf1 $2 {[%eval -419,18][%mdl 8192]} dxe2 $2 { [%eval -103,21]} 19. Rxe2 Nd3 {[%eval -59,22]} 20. Qb1 {[%eval -105,22] [#]} ( 20. Re3 $15 {[%eval -59,22] should be considered.} Nxb2 21. Qa1) 20... Nxf2 $1 21. Rxf2 {Hoping for Qd3.} Bxb3 22. Nxb3 Qxb3 23. Bd3 {[%eval -222,20]} h6 { [%eval -114,20]} 24. Rc2 $2 {[%eval -269,20] [#]} (24. Bh7+ $17 {[%eval -114, 20]} Kf8 25. Qd3 Qxd3 26. Bxd3) 24... Rxc2 {[%eval -142,15]} ({Black should play} 24... Rc5 $1 $19 {[%eval -269,20]} 25. Bh7+ Kh8) 25. Qxc2 Qxc2 26. Bxc2 $19 {[%mdl 4096] Endgame KB-KN} Kf8 27. Kf2 Ke7 28. Ke3 Kd6 29. b4 {[%eval -184,25]} Ke5 30. Be4 b6 31. Bc6 Nf6 32. b5 {[%eval -292,25]} Nd5+ 33. Kd3 f5 34. h4 Nf6 35. Ke2 f4 36. Kf3 fxg3 37. Kxg3 g6 38. Bf3 h5 39. Be2 Ne4+ 40. Kf3 Nd6 41. Kg3 Nf5+ 42. Kh3 Kd5 43. Bf1 Kd4 44. Bg2 Kc4 {[%eval -170,31]} 45. Bc6 {intending Be8.} Kb3 46. Be8 Ne7 ({Weaker is} 46... Kxa3 47. Bxg6 Ng7 48. Kg3 $11) 47. Kg3 Kxa3 48. Kf4 Kb4 49. Kg5 Kc5 50. Bd7 Nd5 {[%eval 0,27]} 51. Kxg6 Kb4 {[%eval 15,27]} 52. Bc6 Kc5 $2 {[%eval 1354,21][%mdl 8192]} (52... Ne7+ $11 {[%eval 0,27]} 53. Kf6 a5) 53. Bxd5 $1 $18 Kxd5 54. Kxh5 {KPP-KPP} Ke6 55. Kg6 Ke7 56. h5 Kd6 57. h6 Kc5 58. h7 Kxb5 59. h8=Q {Qb2+ would kill now.} a5 60. Qd4 a4 {White mates.} 61. Kf6 Ka5 62. Qd6 Kb5 63. Ke5 Ka5 64. Kd4 Ka6 65. Kc4 Kb7 66. Kb5 Ka7 67. Qd7+ Kb8 68. Kxb6 {[%cal Rd7e8]} a3 69. Qe8# {Accuracy: White = 38%, Black = 44%.} 1-0 [Event "30 segundos por movimento"] [White "Novag Constellation Expert"] [Black "Mephisto Rebel"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "E50"] [WhiteElo "1901"] [BlackElo "1872"] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.10 (14s)"] [PlyCount "114"] 1. d4 Nf6 {[%cal Bg8f6,Bf6e4,Be4d2][%mdl 32]} 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e3 O-O 5. Nf3 Ne4 (5... d5 6. Bd2 c5 7. a3 cxd4 8. axb4 dxc3 9. Bxc3 dxc4 10. Bxc4 Qxd1+ 11. Kxd1 Bd7 12. Ke2 Rc8 13. Bd3 Nd5 14. Ne5 Be8 15. Bd2 {1-0 (40) Karjakin,S (2763)-So,W (2799) Berlin 2018}) 6. Bd2 {E50: Nimzo-Indian: Rubinstein: 4...0-0 5 Nf3} (6. Qc2 {is more complex.} f5 7. Bd3 b6 8. O-O Bxc3 9. bxc3 Bb7 10. Nd2) 6... Nxd2 7. Nxd2 Bxc3 $146 ({Predecessor: } 7... d5 8. Bd3 c6 9. Qc2 Kh8 10. O-O-O a5 11. h4 dxc4 12. Bxh7 f5 {1-0 (23) Nasybullina,A (1851)-Ovchenkova,E Dagomys 2009}) 8. bxc3 {The position is equal.} Qg5 9. c5 d5 10. cxd6 cxd6 11. Nf3 Qa5 12. Qc2 Bd7 13. Bd3 Ba4 14. Qb2 ({Don't play} 14. Bxh7+ Kh8 $17) 14... Bc6 15. Qc2 Bxf3 16. gxf3 f5 {[%eval 64, 20]} (16... Rc8 $15 {[%eval -35,19]}) 17. Rb1 Rc8 18. Rb3 {[%eval -2,18]} (18. Kd2 $16 {[%eval 72,19]}) 18... Nd7 $11 19. h4 {[%cal Bh2h4,Bh4h5,Bh5h6][%mdl 32]} Rab8 20. h5 b5 21. h6 g6 22. Qb2 {[%cal Rd3b5]} a6 23. Rg1 {[%eval -69,18] } (23. Ra3 $11 {[%eval -27,18]} Qb6 24. Ke2) 23... Qc7 $15 24. f4 Nf6 25. f3 Nd5 {[%cal Rd5c3]} 26. Kd2 Rb6 {Hoping for ...Qd8.} 27. a4 $1 {[%cal Ra4b5]} bxa4 28. Rxb6 Nxb6 29. Bxa6 Ra8 (29... Rb8 $5 {[%cal Rb6c4]} 30. Qa2 Nd5 $15) 30. Qb5 {[%eval -146,22]} (30. Bd3 $15 {[%eval -35,20]}) 30... Qa7 $36 { [%eval -92,21][%mdl 2048] Black is in control.} (30... d5 $142 {[%eval -146,22] } 31. Ra1 Nc4+ 32. Kd3 a3) 31. Rb1 $17 Qxa6 32. Qxb6 Qxb6 33. Rxb6 {[%mdl 4096] Endgame KR-KR} a3 {[#] ( -> ...a2)} 34. Rb1 Kf7 35. Kc2 {Black should prevent Rb7+.} Kf6 36. Ra1 {[%eval -143,24]} (36. c4 $142 {[%eval -86,25]}) 36... g5 37. fxg5+ Kxg5 38. Kb3 {[%eval -146,25] [#]} (38. c4 $142 {[%eval -86,23]}) 38... Kxh6 {[%eval -55,23]} (38... d5 $1 $17 {[%eval -146,25] Strongly threatening ...a2.} 39. Ka2 Kxh6 40. Rh1+ Kg6) 39. Kb4 $2 {[%eval -329,24] [%mdl 8192]} (39. c4 $1 $15 {[%eval -55,23]}) 39... Kg6 40. Ra2 $2 {[%eval -411,24]} (40. c4 {[%eval -254,23] was the only defense.}) 40... d5 41. f4 { [%eval -786,23]} (41. c4 $142 {[%eval -412,22]} dxc4 42. e4) 41... h5 $19 42. Kb3 Rb8+ 43. Ka4 Kh6 44. Ra1 h4 45. Ra2 Kh5 46. Ra1 a2 47. Ka3 Rb7 48. Ka4 h3 { White must now prevent ...h2.} 49. c4 h2 {Black mates.} 50. c5 Rb1 51. Rxa2 h1=Q 52. e4 dxe4 {[%cal Bd5e4,Be4e3][%mdl 32]} 53. d5 e3 54. Ka5 Qxd5 {[%cal Rd5a2]} 55. Rh2+ Kg4 {[%cal Rd5a8]} 56. Rb2 Rxb2 {[%cal Rd5a8]} 57. Ka4 Qa2# { Accuracy: White = 17%, Black = 53%.} ({Black should try} 57... Qa8# {[%eval -32765,7]}) 0-1

Novag Super Nova

Certamente o computador Novag Super Nova é surpreendente em relação a sua força.

Com 7 jogos, ganhou do Monte Carlo IV, ganhou do Novag Constellation Expert, tendo um desempenho de 2075 de rating. Uma observação importante: 

Devo repetir o confronto com o Novag Supremo, pois ganhou do Super Nova este com rating bem superior. Talvez tenha equacionado errado os níveis dos computadores.

[Event "30 minutos"] [Site "Sao Paulo"] [Date "2018.03.10"] [White "Novag Super Nova"] [Black "Novag Constellation Expert"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "A85"] [PlyCount "86"] [EventCountry "BRA"] 1. c4 f5 2. d4 Nf6 3. Nf3 e6 4. Nc3 Bb4 5. e3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 O-O 7. Bd3 Kh8 8. O-O d6 9. Qc2 b6 10. h3 Nbd7 11. Ng5 Qe8 12. Ba3 Bb7 13. Be2 Qg6 14. Bf3 Ne4 15. Nxe4 fxe4 16. Be2 e5 17. Bg4 Nf6 18. dxe5 Nxg4 19. hxg4 Qxg4 20. exd6 cxd6 21. Bxd6 Rf7 22. Rad1 Rc8 23. Rd4 Kg8 24. Rfd1 Qh5 25. Bb4 Qh4 26. Rd7 Bc6 27. Rxf7 Kxf7 28. c5 a5 29. Qb3+ Ke7 30. cxb6+ axb4 31. Qxb4+ Ke8 32. b7 Bxb7 33. Qxb7 Rxc3 34. Qxg7 Rd3 35. Rxd3 exd3 36. Qg8+ Ke7 37. Qd5 Qf6 38. Qxd3 Qa1+ 39. Kh2 Qe5+ 40. f4 Qh5+ 41. Kg3 Qh1 42. e4 Qe1+ 43. Kf3 Qh1 1-0

Monte Carlo IV x Novag Super Nova

Não obstante o primeiro jogo da Novag contra o monte Carlo IV ter sido uma lástima, estes computadores têm rating semelhantes, tenho que a primeira partida foi atípica. São aqueles casos de erros de cálculos denominados “blunders” muito comum entre os humanos.

Por sua vez, a segunda partida se mostrou mais atrativa, todavia com 14. Bd2 por Monte Carlo, as análises mostram que não seria o melhor caminho para o desenvolvimento do Bispo. Um erro na abertura via de regra traz a vitória para oponente.

[Event "30 minutos"] [Site "Sao Paulo"] [Date "2018.03.10"] [White "Novag Super Nova"] [Black "Mephisto Monte Carlo IV"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "C06"] [WhiteElo "1922"] [BlackElo "1938"] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.10 (14s)"] [PlyCount "35"] [EventCountry "BRA"] 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 cxd4 8. cxd4 Qb6 9. Nf3 f6 10. exf6 Nxf6 11. O-O Bd6 12. Nc3 a6 {[%cal Ba7a6,Ba6b5][%mdl 32] LiveBook: 3 Games. C06: French Tarrasch: 3...Nf6 4 e5 Nfd7 5 Bd3 main lines} 13. Qa4 $146 {[%eval 0,20]} ({White should try} 13. Be3 $14 {[%eval 57,18]}) ({ Predecessor:} 13. Bg5 O-O 14. Na4 Qc7 15. Bh4 b5 16. Nc3 Qf7 17. Bg3 Bxg3 18. hxg3 Qh5 19. Ne5 Qxd1 20. Raxd1 Nxe5 21. dxe5 {1-0 (30) Vescovi,G (2526)-Dos Santos,H (2277) Teresina 2000}) 13... O-O 14. Nb5 $2 {[%eval -408,17][%mdl 8192] [#]} (14. h3 $11 {[%eval 0,18] and White stays safe.}) 14... axb5 $19 15. Bxh7+ {[%eval -801,20]} (15. Qxb5 $142 {[%eval -403,21]} Qc7 16. h3) 15... Nxh7 {Black is clearly winning.} 16. Qxa8 Bd7 17. Qxf8+ Nxf8 18. Be3 0-1 [Event "30 minutos"] [Site "Sao Paulo"] [Date "2018.03.10"] [White "Mephisto Monte Carlo IV"] [Black "Novag Super Nova"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "C84"] [WhiteElo "1938"] [BlackElo "1922"] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.10 (14s)"] [PlyCount "130"] [EventCountry "BRA"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. d4 exd4 6. O-O Be7 7. e5 Ne4 8. Nxd4 O-O 9. Nf5 d5 10. Bxc6 bxc6 11. Nxe7+ Qxe7 12. Re1 Bf5 {C84: Closed Ruy Lopez: Unusual White 6th moves} 13. f3 Nc5 {LiveBook: 4 Games} 14. Bd2 $146 {[%eval -69,18]} ( {White should try} 14. b3 $11 {[%eval 2,20]}) ({Predecessor:} 14. b3 Ne6 15. Ba3 c5 16. Qd2 d4 17. c3 Rfd8 18. c4 a5 19. Qf2 Nf4 20. Qd2 Nd3 21. Re2 a4 22. g4 Bg6 23. f4 Qh4 24. Rg2 Ne1 25. Rg3 Qxg3+ {0-1 (25) An,Z (2169)-Wang,H (2638) Shandong 2007}) 14... Na4 {Black is slightly better.} 15. b4 {[%eval -130,20] [#]} ({Better is} 15. b3 $15 {[%eval -36,20]} Nb6 16. a4) 15... Nb2 {[%eval -60,20]} (15... a5 $1 $17 {[%eval -130,20][%mdl 512]} 16. bxa5 Rfb8) 16. Qc1 $1 $15 {[%cal Rc1b2]} Nc4 17. a3 f6 18. exf6 Qxf6 19. Bc3 Qg6 {Strongly threatening ...Bh3.} 20. Re7 Rf7 21. Rxf7 Kxf7 22. Ra2 $2 {[%eval -183,21]} ( 22. Qf4 $11 {[%eval -30,21]} Kg8 23. Nd2) 22... Re8 $40 {[%mdl 128] White is in trouble.} 23. Qf4 Ne3 {[%csl Ge3][%cal Rg6g2]} (23... Kg8 24. Nd2 $17) 24. g3 {[%eval -301,22]} (24. g4 $142 {[%eval -179,20]} Kg8 25. Bd2 Nxg4 26. Qg3 ( 26. fxg4 $2 Re4 $19)) 24... Kg8 25. Nd2 Nd1 (25... Bxc2 26. Qxc7 Bd3 27. Be5 $15) 26. Be5 Qe6 ({Inferior is} 26... Bxc2 27. Qd4 $11) 27. Ra1 $2 {[%eval -691,21]} (27. g4 {[%eval -310,23]} Qxe5 28. Qxe5 Rxe5 29. gxf5) 27... Bxc2 ({ Not} 27... Qxe5 28. Qxe5 Rxe5 29. Rxd1 $17) 28. Rc1 Ba4 29. Rxd1 {[%eval -821, 20]} (29. b5 $142 {[%eval -421,21]} Qxe5 30. Qxe5 Rxe5 31. bxa6) 29... Bxd1 30. Bc3 Qe3+ 31. Qxe3 Rxe3 {[%mdl 4096] Endgame KRB-KBN} 32. Bb2 Re1+ 33. Nf1 Bxf3 34. Kf2 Re2+ 35. Kxf3 Rxb2 {KR-KN} 36. Ke3 Kf7 37. Nd2 Kf6 38. Nf3 Rb3+ 39. Kf4 Rxa3 40. g4 Ra4 41. g5+ Ke7 42. Ke3 Rxb4 43. Nd4 Kd7 44. Kd3 c5 45. Nf3 Re4 46. h4 c4+ 47. Kc2 Rf4 48. Ne1 d4 49. h5 Rf5 50. g6 Rxh5 51. Nf3 hxg6 {[%cal Bh7g6, Bg6g5][%mdl 32] Black mates.} 52. Nxd4 Rh3 53. Kb2 c5 54. Nc2 g5 55. Ka2 g4 56. Kb1 c3 57. Ka1 g3 58. Ne3 {[#]} g2 $1 59. Nxg2 Rh1+ 60. Ka2 c2 61. Kb3 c1=Q 62. Nf4 Qe3+ 63. Nd3 Qxd3+ 64. Kb2 Rh2+ 65. Kc1 Qc2# {Accuracy: White = 32%, Black = 64%.} 0-1

Módulos e Tabuleiros Mephisto

Mephisto
rating	modelo	programador
1401	Mephisto EBS MM II	Thomas Nitsche, Elmar Henne
1507	Mephisto ESB 6000 III	Nitsche, Thomas & Henne, Elmar
1527	Módulo MM I	Nitsche, Thomas & Henne, Elmar
1545	Modulo Mirage	Nitsche, Thomas & Henne, Elmar
1801	Modulo Blitz	Rathsman, Ulf
1872	Exclusive Rebel	Schröder, Ed
1881	Mephisto Monte Carlo	Morsch, Frans
1896	Mephisto MM II	Rathsman, Ulf
1938	Mephisto Monte Carlo IV	Ed Schröder
1975	Exclusive Polgar	Schröder, Ed
1981	Academy	Schröder, Ed
2005	Mephisto Modular MM IV- V	Schröder, Ed
2007	Mephisto Exclusive Roma 68000	Richard Lang
2075	Exclusive Roma 68020	Richard Lang
2079	Mephisto Modular MM5 18 MHz	Schröder, Ed
2179	Muchen Vancouver 68000	Richard Lang
2400	Exclusive Chess Millenium	Richard Lang
n/a	Mephisto Mobil	n/a

Turma do 65C02 - Monte Carlo IV x Tradechess

Meio de jogo medíocre, lances óbvios que deixo escapar. Para quem deseja um 65C02, nem pensar em máquinas mais fortes. O final já era esperado, mate com torre em g8.

[Site "tradechess"] [Date "2018.03.10"] [Round "1"] [White "Monte Carlo IV"] [Black "tradechess"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "B91"] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.10 (14s)"] [PlyCount "59"] [EventDate "2018.??.??"] 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. g3 g6 {LiveBook: 164 Games} 7. Be3 {B91: Sicilian Najdorf: 6 g3} (7. Bg2 Bg7 8. O-O O-O 9. b3 Bd7 10. Bb2 Nc6 11. Nd5 Re8 12. c4 Nxd5 13. exd5 Nxd4 14. Bxd4 b5 15. Bxg7 Kxg7 16. Qd4+ Kg8 17. Rfc1 {1/2-1/2 (32) Nakamura,H (2781) -Nepomniachtchi,I (2729) London 2017}) ({RR} 7. Bg2 Bg7 8. h3 O-O 9. Be3 Nc6 10. Nd5 Bd7 11. c3 b5 12. O-O Rc8 13. Nxc6 Bxc6 14. Bg5 Bxd5 15. exd5 Qb6 16. a3 a5 17. Re1 Rc7 18. Re2 Re8 19. Qe1 h6 20. Be3 Qb7 21. Qd2 h5 {Ivanov,A (2587)-Izoria,Z (2657) New York 2006 1/2-1/2 (35)}) ({RR} 7. Bg2 Bg7 8. h3 Nbd7 9. a4 Qc7 10. Nde2 Ne5 11. O-O O-O 12. Nd5 Nxd5 13. exd5 Bd7 14. Nd4 Rfc8 15. c3 Be8 16. Re1 h6 17. Kh2 Qd8 18. Re2 Bf8 19. Bf4 Nd7 20. Qd2 Kh7 21. g4 Nf6 { Jarek,K (1893)-Dekic,B (2059) Cammeray 2015 1-0 (73)}) 7... Bg7 8. Be2 $146 ({ Predecessor:} 8. Qd2 Nbd7 9. O-O-O b5 10. Kb1 Bb7 11. Bh6 Bxh6 12. Qxh6 Rc8 13. Qd2 Ne5 14. Bd3 b4 15. Nce2 {1/2-1/2 (38) Boros,D (2443)-Thorfinnsson,B (2328) Budapest 2005}) ({RR} 8. Qd2 Nc6 9. f3 O-O 10. O-O-O Nxd4 11. Bxd4 b5 12. Kb1 Be6 13. Ne2 Rc8 14. g4 Qc7 15. h4 Rfd8 16. g5 Nh5 17. Bxg7 Kxg7 18. Bh3 Bxh3 19. Rxh3 Qc5 20. Ng3 Nf4 21. Rh2 Qe5 22. Rg1 d5 {Perdomo Abad,J (2265)-Camino Carrio,N Las Palmas 1995 1/2-1/2 (55)}) 8... Qc7 9. f4 {White is slightly better.} e5 {[%eval 53,20]} (9... O-O $11 {[%eval 9,18]}) 10. Nb3 $14 Nc6 {[#]} 11. a4 {[%eval -22,18]} (11. g4 $1 $16 {[%eval 89,18]}) 11... b6 {[%eval 88,18] } (11... Bh3 $11 {[%eval -22,18] remains equal.}) 12. Bc4 $2 {[%eval -92,18]} O-O 13. Bf2 {[%eval -181,17]} Bb7 {[%eval -94,18]} (13... Nb4 $19 {[%eval -181, 17]} 14. Bd3 (14. Be2 Nxe4 15. Nxe4 Nxc2+ 16. Kf1 Nxa1 17. Nxa1 Bb7) 14... Bh3) 14. O-O $17 Na5 {[%eval -19,21]} (14... exf4 $17 {[%eval -99,17] aiming for ... Nb4.} 15. gxf4 Nb4) 15. Nxa5 $11 bxa5 16. Qd3 Rfc8 {[%eval 38,18]} (16... Rac8 $11 {[%eval -19,19]} 17. Bxa6 exf4) 17. Bb3 $14 Ng4 18. Nd5 (18. fxe5 {seems wilder.} Nxe5 19. Qd1 Nc4 20. Bd4 Be5 21. Bxe5 dxe5 22. Qe2) 18... Bxd5 $1 19. Bxd5 Rab8 20. fxe5 {[%eval -69,18]} (20. Qf3 $11 {[%eval -6,18]} Nxf2 21. Rxf2) 20... Nxf2 $2 {[%eval 110,19]} ({Don't play} 20... dxe5 $6 21. Bb3 $14) (20... Bxe5 $15 {[%eval -69,18]} 21. Bb3 Bxb2) 21. Rxf2 $16 {[#] Threatens to win with exd6.} dxe5 {[%eval 216,20]} (21... Bxe5 $16 {[%eval 95,19] keeps fighting.} 22. c3 (22. Rxf7 Qb6+ 23. Rf2+ Kg7 $16) (22. Bxf7+ Kg7 $16) 22... Qa7) 22. Rxf7 $18 Qb6+ 23. Kh1 Kh8 24. Bb3 Rd8 25. Qe2 Bh6 26. Raf1 Rd2 $2 { [%eval 367,21]} (26... Qe3 {[%eval 191,20]} 27. Qxe3 Bxe3) 27. Rf8+ {[%eval 170,23]} (27. Qg4 $142 {[%eval 367,21]}) 27... Rxf8 28. Rxf8+ Kg7 $2 {[%eval 897,20]} (28... Bxf8 {[%eval 169,23]} 29. Qxd2 Qb4) 29. Qf1 {[%csl Gb3][%cal Rf8g8]} Rd1 30. Rg8# {Precision: White = 32%, Black = 13%.} 1-0

Mephisto III - ESB Board

Antes:

agora

Chess Champion 2150l - display

Referido display é usado igualmente em outros computadores, exemplo, Renaissance.

Módulo "THE KING" Exclusive Chessgenius

Notícias dão conta que o novo módulo contendo o o programa que roda no Tasc - R30/R40 será disponibilizado em meados de 2018.
Bom, para aqueles que gostam de programas fortes, o rating esperado deverá atingir cerca 2500 elo.  Como eu sou da turma do 65C02, não sei até que ponto este módulo deverá atrair meus "€". Fica o lembrete.

Gibson declara falência

A exemplo do que aconteceu com a Fidelity, Mephisto e outros, resulta da incompetência dos administradores, não souberam vender a preços competitivos, resultado = falência.