Millennium Chess Genius Pro – primeira derrota

Após o confronto com Elite versão 11 com uma vitória e um empate, Millennium Chess Genius Pro não resistiu ao Shredder v. 11.74, engine presente no Ressurrection II 32 bits.

[Event "?"] [Site "?"] [Date "2017.09.07"] [Round "?"] [White "Shredder v. 11.74"] [Black "Millenium Chess Genius Pro"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "C18"] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.04 (14s)"] [PlyCount "129"] [EventDate "2017.??.??"] 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 Ne7 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 c5 7. Qg4 O-O 8. Bd3 Qa5 9. Bd2 f5 {[%emt 0:00:07] C18: French: 3 Nc3 Bb4: Main line: h4 and 7 Qg4} (9... Nbc6 10. Nf3 f5 11. exf6 Rxf6 12. Qh5 Nf5 13. Ne5 c4 14. Bxf5 Rxf5 15. Qe8+ Rf8 16. Nxc6 bxc6 17. Qxc6 Rb8 18. O-O {0-1 (58) Topalov,V (2735) -Ponomariov,R (2718) Leon 2003}) 10. exf6 Rxf6 11. Nf3 {LiveBook: 5 Games. Strongly threatening c4.} h6 {[%eval 105,19]} (11... Nbc6 $11 {[%eval 26,18] remains equal.}) 12. Qh5 $1 $16 {[%cal Rh5e8] [#] Qe8+ is the strong threat.} Bd7 13. O-O {[%eval 4,20]} (13. Ne5 $16 {[%eval 127,19]}) 13... c4 $1 $11 { [%cal Rc4d3]} 14. Be2 Nbc6 15. Qg4 $146 ({Predecessor:} 15. Rfb1 Qc7 16. Ne5 Nxe5 17. Qxe5 {1/2-1/2 (41) Escobar Forero,A (2469)-Mosquera, M (2375) Pamplona 2012}) 15... Qc7 16. Qg3 Qxg3 17. fxg3 Raf8 18. g4 b6 19. g5 hxg5 20. Bxg5 Rf5 21. g3 {[%cal Bg2g3,Bg3g4][%mdl 32]} Ng6 22. Rad1 Kh8 {[%eval 46,22]} (22... e5 $11 {[%eval 4,20]} 23. g4 R5f7) 23. h4 $14 {[%cal Bh2h4,Bh4h5][%mdl 32]} Kg8 24. h5 Nge7 {[%eval 81,22]} ({Black should play} 24... e5 $1 $14 { [%eval 31,24]} 25. hxg6 e4) 25. Kg2 $16 Be8 26. g4 R5f7 27. Rh1 Kh8 {[%eval 117,20]} (27... Nc8 $14 {[%eval 61,21]}) 28. h6 {aiming for hxg7+.} Ng8 29. hxg7+ Kxg7 30. Kg3 Bd7 31. Be3 Rf6 {[%eval 113,20]} (31... Kg6 $14 {[%eval 70, 17]}) 32. Rh2 {Hoping for Rdh1.} Be8 {[%eval 176,22]} (32... Nh6 $16 {[%eval 110,19]} 33. Rdh1 Nf7) 33. g5 $36 {[%mdl 2048] White is on the roll.} Rf5 34. Rdh1 {[#] Threatens to win with Rh7+.} Bg6 35. Nh4 Nge7 36. Bg4 (36. Nxf5+ Nxf5+ 37. Kf3 Nfxd4+ 38. Kg3 Nb5 $11) 36... Rh8 {[%eval 288,24]} (36... Bh7 $142 {[%eval 193,21]} 37. g6 (37. Nxf5+ Nxf5+ 38. Bxf5 Bxf5 $18) 37... Bxg6 38. Nxg6 (38. Nxf5+ Nxf5+ 39. Bxf5 Rxf5 $16) 38... Kxg6) 37. Nxf5+ Nxf5+ 38. Bxf5 Rxh2 39. Rxh2 ({Resist} 39. Kxh2 $6 Bxf5 40. Kg3 Nd8 $18) 39... Bxf5 {[%mdl 4096] Endgame KRB-KBN} 40. Bf4 Kf7 {[%eval 412,25]} (40... Kg8 $142 {[%eval 278,25]} 41. Rh6 Ne7) 41. Bd6 Kg8 42. Kf4 Kg7 {[%eval 532,24]} (42... Nd8 $142 {[%eval 372,23]} 43. Be5 Nf7) 43. Rh6 Bg6 44. Be5+ Kf7 45. Rh8 Bxc2 46. Rc8 Ne7 {[%eval 579,22]} (46... Nxe5 $142 {[%eval 401,23]} 47. Kxe5 Kg6 48. Rg8+ Kf7) 47. Rc7 {White is clearly winning.} Ke8 48. Rxa7 Ng6+ 49. Ke3 b5 50. Rb7 Ba4 51. Bd6 Kd8 52. Kd2 Ke8 53. Rg7 Nh4 54. Re7+ Kd8 55. Rh7 Ng6 56. Rg7 Nh4 57. g6 Nxg6 58. Rxg6 Kd7 59. Bb4 Bb3 60. Rg7+ Kc8 61. Re7 Ba2 62. Rxe6 Bb1 63. Rb6 Kc7 64. Rxb5 {Threatening mate with Bd6+!} Be4 65. a4 1-0

Kasparov x Turbostar 432

A referencia que possuo deste jogo reside em uma simultânea de Kasparov com o s computadores de xadrez  ante uma reportagem da Chessbase.

Em 6 de junho de 1985, Garry Kasparov, de 22 anos, chegou a Hamburgo para fazer uma partida de preparação para a candidatura ao Campeonato do Mundo - e fazer uma entrevista extremamente crítica com uma importante revista de notícias alemã. Durante a visita, ele jogou uma simultânea contra 32 computadores de xadrez, talvez os  mais fortes à época.

Disse kasparov:

“Em algum momento, eu percebi que estava com problemas em um jogo contra um dos modelos de marca "Kasparov". Se esta máquina marcasse uma vitória ou até um empate, as pessoas seriam rápidas em dizer que eu joguei para promover a empresa, então eu tive que intensificar meus esforços. Eventualmente, encontrei uma maneira de "blefar" a máquina com um sacrifício duvidoso que qualquer computador de xadrez moderno poderia refutar em uma fração de segundo.”

foto extraída: http://www.chesscomputeruk.com/html/turbostar_432___kso.html

[Event "Hamburg Spiegel sim comp"] [Site "Hamburg"] [Date "1985.??.??"] [Round "26"] [White "Kasparov, Garry"] [Black "Comp Turbostar 432"] [Result "1-0"] [WhiteElo "2715"] [Annotator "Garry Kasparov"] [PlyCount "87"] [EventDate "1985.??.??"] 1. c4 e6 2. g3 Nf6 3. Bg2 d5 4. Nf3 dxc4 5. O-O c6 6. a4 Be7 7. Qc2 Nbd7 8. Qxc4 Nb6 9. Qc2 Nfd5 10. Nc3 Nb4 11. Qd1 O-O 12. d4 a5 13. e4 Bd7 14. Qe2 Be8 15. Rd1 f6 16. Be3 Bh5 17. h3 f5 18. Bf4 Qd7 19. Re1 Bxf3 20. Bxf3 Bd6 21. Bxd6 Qxd6 22. Rad1 f4 23. g4 Rad8 24. Rd2 e5 25. d5 h6 26. Red1 c5 27. Qb5 Ra8 28. Qf1 Qd7 29. b3 c4 30. bxc4 Rac8 31. g5 Nxc4 {[#]After getting a fine position out of the opening, I drifted a little and the computer managed to get a small advantage. As you can see in the diagram the black knights are menacingly placed. After a passive move like Re2, the position would have been unpleasant but only slightly worse for White. Instead I decided to throw the machine off balance and sacrifice an exchange, which was objectively terrible but "psychologically" brilliant. At the time, it was understood by any strong player with experience versus computers that their main weakness was... tactics! In particular, combinations more than a few moves deep or involving pawn promotion, as the case here.} 32. Ra2 $2 {A terrible move, but not an oversight!} (32. Re2 $17 {White's position would not be so bad.}) 32... Nxa2 33. Nxa2 Qxa4 {Against any good human player, it should be all over, but...} 34. gxh6 Qxa2 {So far so good...} 35. Qg2 Rc7 36. d6 Rd7 (36... Rcf7 $19 { was better. But I was gambling that the computer would want more material instead of returning any.} 37. Bh5) 37. Bg4 Qb3 $4 {What a relief! It's all over now.} (37... Qa4 $1 $19 {This would have been much better but the computer back then did not realize that it was more important to defend d7 than to take on d1. I could still capture on d7 hoping it would blunder and take the rook with check instead of taking the bishop.}) 38. Bxd7 Qxd1+ 39. Kh2 {The mate on g7 is impossible to defend.} Rf7 40. Be6 Kf8 41. h7 $1 {The h-pawn queens.} Nxd6 42. h8=Q+ {My modern computer says 42.Qg5 is a faster mate, so pardon me for playing like a human.} Ke7 43. Bxf7 Nxf7 44. Qhxg7 { A slightly embarrassing escape for me, I admit, but one that nevertheless serves as an educational time capsule of the state of computer chess at the time. Despite this swindle and a few other weak computer efforts, I wouldn't want to diminish my own play entirely. Looking at all the games again, the computers rarely blundered and it required energy and precision to make a clean score against them on so many boards even 30 years ago.} 1-0

Elite V11 x Millenium Chess Genius Pro

Elite não entende que a partida está empatada, sinalizando vantagem decisiva para as pretas.

[Event "30 minutos"] [Date "2017.09.05"] [Round "?"] [White "Elite V11"] [Black "Millennium Chess Genius Pro"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "B33"] [PlyCount "173"] [EventDate "2017.??.??"] [SourceDate "2008.12.28"] 1. e4 c5 2. Ne2 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 e5 6. Ndb5 d6 7. Nd5 Nxd5 8. exd5 Ne7 9. c3 Nf5 10. a4 a6 11. Na3 Be7 12. Bd3 O-O 13. O-O Bd7 14. Re1 Nh4 15. Qb3 Qc7 16. Be3 Bf5 17. Be2 Be4 18. f3 Bg6 19. Nc4 Rac8 20. Qb4 Nf5 21. Bf2 Ra8 22. a5 Rab8 23. Rad1 Nh6 24. Nxe5 dxe5 25. d6 Bxd6 26. Rxd6 Nf5 27. Rd2 Rfc8 28. Bd1 f6 29. Bb6 Qe7 30. Bb3+ Kh8 31. Qxe7 Nxe7 32. Red1 Re8 33. Ba4 Rg8 34. Rd7 Be8 35. Bb3 Bxd7 36. Rxd7 Nc6 37. Bxg8 Kxg8 38. Kf2 h5 39. Kg3 g6 40. b4 f5 41. Bc5 g5 42. Bd6 Rd8 43. Rxd8+ Nxd8 44. Bxe5 f4+ 45. Kf2 Kf7 46. Bc7 Ne6 47. Bd6 Kg6 48. Ke2 Kf5 49. Be7 g4 50. Kd3 Ke5 51. c4 Kf5 52. b5 gxf3 53. gxf3 Ke5 54. bxa6 bxa6 55. h4 Ng7 56. Bc5 Nf5 57. Bf2 Ne7 58. Bb6 Ng6 59. Bc7+ Ke6 60. Ke4 Nxh4 61. Kxf4 Kd7 62. Bb6 Ke6 63. Bf2 Ng6+ 64. Ke4 h4 65. f4 h3 66. Bg1 Ne7 67. Kf3 Kf5 68. Kg3 Nc6 69. Bh2 Nxa5 70. c5 Nc6 71. Bg1 Ke4 72. Kxh3 Kxf4 73. Bh2+ Ke4 74. Bc7 Kd5 75. Bb6 Ne5 76. Kg3 Nd3 77. Kf3 Nb2 78. Ke3 Nc4+ 79. Kd3 Ne5+ 80. Kc3 Nc6 81. Kd3 Nb8 82. Kc3 Nd7 83. Kb4 Kc6 84. Ka5 Nxb6 85. Kxa6 Nc8 86. Ka5 Na7 87. Kb4 1/2-1/2

Elite V11 was unable to hold the Millenium Chess Genius Pro

[Event "30 minutos"] [Date "2017.09.05"] [Round "?"] [White "Millennium Chess Genius Pro"] [Black "Elite V11"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "D02"] [WhiteElo ""] [BlackElo ""] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.04 (14s)"] [PlyCount "155"] [EventDate "2017.??.??"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. g3 d5 3. Bg2 e6 4. Nf3 Bd6 5. O-O c5 (5... O-O 6. b3 Nbd7 7. Bb2 b5 8. Ne5 Bb7 9. c4 bxc4 10. bxc4 Rb8 11. Nxd7 Qxd7 12. c5 Ba6 13. Bc3 Be7 {1-0 (33) Burmakin,V (2508) -Bashirli,N (2349) Nakhchivan 2017}) 6. Nc3 {D02: 1 d4 d5 2 Nf3 sidelines, including 2...Nf6 3 g3 and 2...Nf6 3 Bf4} Nc6 7. Nb5 Be7 8. Bf4 {White has an edge.} O-O 9. c3 $146 {[%eval -47,20]} (9. c4 $11 {[%eval 13,18]}) ({ Predecessor:} 9. Ne5 Qb6 10. c4 Nxd4 11. Nxd4 cxd4 12. b3 dxc4 13. bxc4 Rd8 14. a4 {1/2-1/2 (23) Olsen,M (1976)-Kirknel,T (2160) Copenhagen 2013}) 9... a6 $15 10. Na3 $1 Qa5 11. Qc2 {[%eval -44,18]} cxd4 12. cxd4 Bxa3 {[%eval -5,18]} 13. bxa3 $11 Qxa3 14. Rab1 a5 15. Rb3 Qa4 16. Qb2 {[%mdl 1024] White has compensation.} Ne4 17. Rc1 f6 18. e3 Nb4 19. a3 Na6 $1 20. Bf1 $36 {[%mdl 2048] And now Bb5 would win. White has the initiative.} Qe8 21. Rb6 g5 {[%eval 63,22] } (21... Qd8 $11 {[%eval 16,20]}) 22. Bd6 $1 $14 {[%cal Rd6f8]} Nxd6 23. Rxd6 g4 24. Nd2 Nb8 {[%eval 132,20]} 25. Rc7 $16 Rf7 26. Rxf7 $1 Kxf7 27. Qc2 $1 { [%cal Rc2h7]} Kg8 28. Bb5 {[%eval 49,24]} Nc6 $1 $14 29. Bxc6 bxc6 30. Rxc6 Bd7 31. Rc7 Rc8 {[%eval 105,22]} 32. Nb3 $16 a4 33. Rxc8 $1 Bxc8 34. Nc5 Bd7 35. Qb1 Bc6 36. Qb6 h6 37. Qc7 h5 38. Nd3 Bb5 {[#]} 39. Nf4 $1 Ba6 40. Nxh5 { [%eval 54,22]} ({Better is} 40. Qd6 $16 {[%eval 116,21]} Bc8 41. Qc7) 40... Qxh5 $14 41. Qb8+ Kg7 {Hoping for ...Be2.} 42. Qa7+ Kh6 {...Be2 is the strong threat.} 43. Qxa6 {[%mdl 4096] Endgame KQ-KQ} Qe8 {[%eval 130,22]} ({Black should play} 43... Qf5 $1 $14 {[%eval 61,23]}) 44. Kg2 Kg7 45. h4 gxh3+ 46. Kxh3 Qd7 47. g4 Kf8 48. Kg3 Qc7+ 49. Kg2 Qd7 50. f4 {Strongly threatening f5!} Ke8 $2 {[%eval 422,21]} 51. Kg3 {[%eval 187,22]} Kf8 $2 {[%eval 553,21] [#]} ( 51... Kf7 {[%eval 187,22]} 52. Qb6 Kg7) 52. Kf2 $2 {[%eval 186,19]} (52. f5 $1 {[%eval 553,21][%mdl 512]} Qc7+ (52... exf5 53. Qxf6+) 53. Kf3) 52... Ke7 53. Ke1 Ke8 {[%eval 222,21]} 54. Ke2 Kf7 55. Kd2 Ke7 56. Kc3 Qc7+ 57. Kb4 Qc2 $2 { [%eval 1624,16]} (57... Kf7 {[%eval 216,18]} 58. Qd3 (58. Qxa4 Qc4+ 59. Ka5 Qc7+ 60. Ka6 Qc8+ 61. Ka7 Qc7+ 62. Ka6 Qc8+ 63. Kb6 Qb8+ 64. Kc5 Qf8+ 65. Kb6 Qb8+ 66. Ka5 Qc7+ 67. Kb5 Qb8+ 68. Kc5 Qf8+ 69. Kb6 Qb8+ $11) (58. Kxa4 Qc2+ 59. Kb4 Qd2+ 60. Kc5 Qxe3 $16) 58... Qc6) 58. Qa7+ $18 Kd8 59. Qa5+ Ke7 60. Qc5+ Qxc5+ 61. dxc5 {KP-KP} e5 62. fxe5 fxe5 63. g5 d4 64. exd4 e4 65. d5 { White mates.} e3 66. Kc3 e2 67. Kd2 Kf8 68. c6 Ke7 69. g6 Kf6 70. c7 Kxg6 71. c8=Q Kg5 72. d6 Kf4 73. d7 Kf3 74. d8=Q e1=Q+ 75. Kxe1 Ke3 76. Qg5+ Kd3 77. Qd5+ Ke3 78. Qc1# 1-0

Millennium Chess Genius Pro

Dr. S x Novag Sapphire - game in 10

[Event "?"] [Site "?"] [Date "2017.09.01"] [Round "?"] [White "Dr. S"] [Black "Novag Sapphire"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "A56"] [WhiteElo ""] [BlackElo ""] [Annotator "Tactical Analysis 2.04 (14s)"] [PlyCount "85"] [EventDate "2017.??.??"] 1. d4 {[%cal Bd2d4,Bd4d5][%mdl 32]} c5 2. d5 d6 3. c4 Nf6 4. Nf3 e5 5. Nc3 Qa5 $146 ({Predecessor:} 5... g6 6. e4 Bg7 7. Be2 O-O 8. Bg5 h6 9. Bh4 Nbd7 10. O-O g5 11. Bg3 Nh5 12. Nd2 Nf4 13. Bg4 Bf6 14. Rb1 Kg7 15. f3 h5 16. Bf5 Rh8 17. Bf2 Qf8 18. Qc2 Bd8 19. g3 Ng6 20. Nd1 Ne7 { 1/2-1/2 (59) Markowski,T (2575)-Weiss,C (2361) Germany 2017}) 6. Bd2 {A56: Czech Benoni} Nbd7 7. e4 Be7 8. Be2 {White is better.} O-O 9. O-O Re8 10. h3 h6 11. Nh2 {[%eval 65,19]} (11. Nh4 $16 {[%eval 109,19]}) 11... Qa6 12. f4 { [%eval 13,20]} (12. a4 $16 {[%eval 85,20]}) 12... Bd8 {[%eval 80,19]} (12... exf4 $1 $11 {[%eval 13,20] remains equal.} 13. Bxf4 Bd8) 13. f5 $1 $16 Ba5 { White should prevent ...Bxc3.} 14. Bd3 Rb8 15. Qf3 (15. Qe2 {keeps more tension.} Qb6 16. a3 a6 17. Rfc1 Qc7 18. Rab1) 15... Qb6 16. Rab1 Bxc3 17. Bxc3 Qa6 18. a3 Nb6 19. Qe2 Bd7 20. g4 {[%eval 91,18]} (20. Be1 $142 {[%eval 144,19] }) 20... Ba4 {[%eval 134,20]} (20... Nh7 $142 {[%eval 91,18]} 21. b3 Na8) 21. b4 {[%eval 91,19]} (21. b3 $142 {[%eval 134,20]} Bd7 22. h4) 21... Bd7 { [%eval 141,17]} (21... Nbd7 $142 {[%eval 91,19]}) 22. Bb2 {[%eval 24,18]} (22. Bd2 $16 {[%eval 141,17]}) 22... Na4 $1 $11 23. b5 $1 {[%cal Rb5a6]} Qa5 { [%eval 83,19]} ({Black should play} 23... Qb6 $14 {[%eval 31,21]}) 24. h4 { [%eval -2,19]} (24. Bc1 $1 $16 {[%eval 83,19]}) 24... a6 25. g5 Nxb2 26. Qxb2 { [%eval -32,18]} ({Much less strong is} 26. Rxb2 $6 hxg5 27. hxg5 Nh7 $18) ({ White should try} 26. gxf6 $14 {[%eval 69,16]} gxf6 27. Rxb2) 26... hxg5 27. hxg5 Nh5 {Threatens to win with ...axb5.} 28. bxa6 Qxa6 29. f6 {[%eval -76,18]} (29. Nf3 $1 $15 {[%eval -33,18]}) 29... gxf6 $2 {[%eval 174,17]} (29... Ra8 $17 {[%eval -76,18] keeps the pressure on.} 30. fxg7 (30. Qxb7 Red8 $15) 30... Kxg7 ) 30. gxf6 $2 {[%eval -93,19]} ({White must play} 30. Qe2 $1 $18 {[%eval 174, 17][%cal Re2h5]} Ng3 31. Qg2) 30... Kf8 $2 {[%eval 1847,20][%mdl 8192]} (30... Kh7 $17 {[%eval -93,19]} 31. Nf3 Rg8+ 32. Kf2 Nxf6) 31. Qg2 Qxa3 32. Rf3 { Strongly threatening Qg5.} Nxf6 33. Rxf6 $2 {[%eval 256,19]} (33. Qg5 {[%eval 986,14]} Re6 34. dxe6 Bxe6 35. Qxf6) 33... Qxd3 $18 34. Rbf1 $40 {[%csl Gf1] [%cal Rf6f7][%mdl 128] White is out for blood.} Re7 $2 {[%eval 1247,17]} (34... Qe3+ {[%eval 215,22]} 35. R1f2 (35. Kh1 Ke7 $18) 35... Ke7 36. Rxf7+ Kd8) 35. Qg5 {[%eval 565,19]} (35. Qg6 $142 {[%eval 1247,17][%cal Rf6f7]} Qe3+ 36. Kh1) 35... Qd4+ 36. Kh1 Qxe4+ {[#]} 37. R1f3 $2 {[%eval 0,20]} (37. Nf3 $1 $18 { [%eval 215,19]} Qg4 38. Qh6+ Qg7 39. Qh4) 37... Qb1+ $2 {[%eval 423,16][%mdl 8192] [#]} (37... Ra8 $1 $11 {[%eval 0,20]} 38. Qh6+ Kg8) 38. Rf1 $2 {[%eval 21,20]} (38. Nf1 $1 $18 {[%eval 423,16] White wants to mate with Rh6.} Qe4 39. Qh6+ Kg8 40. Kg1 Qd4+ 41. Ne3 Qa1+ 42. Kh2 Qa2+ 43. Rf2) 38... Qh7 $2 {[%eval 1873,16][%mdl 8192]} (38... Qe4+ $11 {[%eval 21,20]} 39. R1f3 Ra8 40. Qh6+ Kg8) 39. Rh6 Qg7 40. Rg6 {[%eval 547,23]} (40. Qh4 $142 {[%eval 1666,19]} f5 41. Rh8+ Qxh8 42. Qxh8+ Kf7 43. Qxb8 Re8 44. Qxd6 Re7 45. Rg1) 40... Qh8 41. Rh6 { [%cal Rh6h8]} Qg7 42. Rg6 $2 {[%eval 209,21]} (42. Qh4 {[%eval 1387,18] Intending Rh8+ and mate.} Re6 43. Rh8+ Qxh8 44. Qxh8+ Ke7 45. Qh4+ Ke8 46. Qh8+ Ke7 47. Qh4+ Ke8 48. Qh7) 42... Qh7 $2 {[%eval 482,19]} (42... Qh8 {[%eval 209, 21]} 43. Rh6 Qg7) 43. Rh6 $2 {[%eval 0,36]} (43. Qf6 $18 {[%eval 482,19]} Ke8 44. Rh6 Qe4+ 45. Nf3) 1/2-1/2