Novag Supremo x Novag Super Nova

Apesar do wiki mostrar um rating superior para o Super Nova, nos meus testes Supremo superou o Super Nova. A primeira partida foi em 30 minutos e a segunda, 30 segundos por movimento.

Hersteller	Novag	Jahr:	1988
Elo	1650	Preis
Programmierer	Kittinger, David	BT-2450
Prozessor	6301Y	BT-2630
Prozessortyp	8 Bit, Singlechip	Colditz
Takt	2 MHz (8 MHz Quarz)	Rechentiefe	16 Halbzüge
RAM	2 KB	Display	4-stellige 7-Segment Anzeige
ROM	32 KB	Zugeingabe	Drucksensoren
Bibliothek	15.000 Halbzüge	Zugausgabe	4-stellige 7-Segment Anzeige und 16 Rand-LED's
Spielstufen	48
Maße	30,0 x 27,2 x 2,8 cm
Stromversorgung	Batterie = 6 x AA, Netz = Novag 8210
Verwandt	Novag Super Nova
Novag Super Nova
Hersteller	Novag	Jahr:	1990
Elo	1734	Preis
Programmierer	Kittinger, David	BT-2450
Prozessor	6301Y	BT-2630
Prozessortyp	8 Bit, Singlechip	Colditz
Takt	4 MHz (16 MHz Quarz)	Rechentiefe	16 Halbzüge
RAM	8 KB	Display	4-stellige 7-Segment Anzeige
ROM	32 KB	Zugeingabe	Drucksensoren
Bibliothek	15.000 Halbzüge	Zugausgabe	4-stellige 7-Segment Anzeige, 16 Rand LEDs
Spielstufen	48
Maße	Spielfeldgröße 22 cm
Stromversorgung	Batterie = 6 x AA, Netz = 9V
Verwandt	Novag Super VIP

Novag Super Nova-Novag SupremoNovag Supremo-Novag Super Nova

ChessBase

Novag Super Nova–Novag Supremo0–1B1230 minutos31.12.2017Tactical Analysis 2.10 (14s)

1.e4 c6 2.d4 g6 3.c3 g7 4.f3 d5 5.bd2 f6 5...g4 6.h3 xf3 7.xf3 e6 8.d3 e7 9.0-0 0-0 10.e1 d7 11.g3 c5 12.exd5 xd5 13.dxc5 xc5 1/2-1/2 (62) Felgaer,R (2586)-Riazantsev,A (2700) Tromsoe 2013 6.e5 B12: Caro-Kann: Advance Variation h5 LiveBook: 3 Games 7.b3 0-0 8.g1N White is better. Predecessor: 8.h3 f5 9.e2 f4 10.c5 b6 11.d3 a6 12.g5 f5 13.e6 1-0 (50) Jonkman,H (2310)-Spielberger,H Bad Wiessee 1998 8...h8 9.d3 9.e2± 9...f6 10.f3 10.f4 10...fxe5= 11.xe5 f4 11...xe5 12.dxe5 d7 12.xf4 xf4 13.c5 White should try 13.d2 xe5 14.dxe5 13...b6 14.d2 f8 15.b3 f5 15...c5 16.c2 c4 16.0-0 e6 16...xe5!= 17.dxe5 c5 17.e2 Threatens to win with g4. c5 17...h5 18.e3? 18.g4!+- 18...d7 19.f4 Better is 19.xd7 cxd4 20.xd4 xd7 21.ad1 21.xf5 xf5 22.g4 e5 19...cxd4 Black should play 19...xe5= 20.dxe5 g7 20.cxd4 c8 21.ac1 xc1 22.xc1 f6 22...xe5 23.dxe5 g5 23.d2 Keeping Black busy. e4 24.g4 xe5 25.fxe5 xd2 26.gxf5 aiming for f6. e4 26...c4± 27.xc4 dxc4 27.fxe6? 27.f6+- 27...e7 28.c6 b4 28...h4= 29.d3± f2?

29...xb2± is more resistant. 30.e7 e8 31.xe4 dxe4 32.b3+ 32.xe4 a1+ 33.g2 xa2+ 34.c2 e6± 32...xb3 33.axb3 xe7 30.e7? 30.xg6!+- Intending Bf7+ and mate. h3+ 30...hxg6 31.e7 31.h1 hxg6 32.e7 30...xe7= 31.b5? 31.c2= xd3 32.xd3 31...h4 31...g4 32.d2 h4 32.f1? 32.f6-+ xf6 33.exf6 32...xh2+? 32...g4+ mates 33.g2

h3+! 34.xh3 xd4+ 35.h1 d1+ 36.f1 xf1+ 37.g2 e2+ 38.g3 f2+ 39.g4 f4# 33.xh2 g4+ 34.g3 xe3 Endgame KRB-KRN 35.g2 35.h3= remains equal. 35...g7 35...h5 And now ...g5 would win. 36.f3 36.xg6+? h7-+ 36...f5+ 37.h3 e7 36.h3 h5 ...g5 is the strong threat. 37.c7+ f7 38.d7? 38.c3! f5+ 39.xf5 xf5 40.c7+ f7 41.c6 38...xd7-+ 39.xd7 KB-KN g5 40.e6 f8 41.f3 e7 42.g8 f5 43.xd5 xd4+ 44.e4 e2 45.c4 g3+ 46.e3 h4 47.f3 f5 48.e4 h6 49.d5? 49.f3 49...h3 50.f3 50.a8 might work better. 50...g4+ 51.g3 f5+ 52.h2 e3 53.b3 f1+ 54.h1 g3 55.a3 g2+ 56.g1 e3 57.a4 g4 58.e6 e5 59.d5 d6 60.b7 xe6 61.c8+ d7 62.b4 d6 63.f2 c7 64.a6 f6 65.e2 d6 66.a5 bxa5 67.bxa5 c5 68.a6 d5 69.f3+ e5 70.c6 g4+ 71.g1 f4 72.xg2 h2+ 73.f1 g3 74.h1 f2 75.b7 h1+ 76.xh1 xh1 KN-KP 77.g1 f2 78.f1 f3 79.e1 e3 80.f1 d3 81.g2 c5 82.h3 xa6 83.g2 f4 84.f2 c5 85.e2 a5 86.d1 a4 87.c2 e3 88.b1 d3 89.b2 d2 90.a2 c2 91.a1 b3 ( -> ...Nd3) 92.b1 d3 Black mates. 93.a1 a3 94.b1 b4 95.c1 a2 96.d2 a1 97.e2 c3 98.f2 d5 99.g2 d3 100.h1 f3+ Precision: White = 33%, Black = 45%. 0–1

Download PGN